Land, Livelihoods, and Remittances: A Political Ecology of Youth Out-migration across the Lao-Thai Mekong Border
Title | Land, Livelihoods, and Remittances: A Political Ecology of Youth Out-migration across the Lao-Thai Mekong Border |
Annotated Record | Annotated |
Year of Publication | 2012 |
Authors | Barney K |
Secondary Title | Critical Asian Studies |
Volume | 44 |
Issue | 1 |
Pagination | 57-83 |
Key themes | FDI, Gender, MigrationLabour |
Abstract | This article seeks to draw connections between a political ecology of global investment in resource sector development and a culturally informed understanding of rural out-migration across the Lao–Thai border. The author highlights how the departures of rural youth for wage labor in Thailand and the remittances they return to sending villages are becoming important for understanding agrarian transformations in Laos today. In the first section the author introduces the contemporary context of cross-border migrations across the Lao–Thai Mekong border. The second section shifts focus to a village in Laos’s central Khammouane Province, where extended field research was conducted between 2006 and 2009. In this village, youth out-migration to Thailand has become a widespread phenomenon, with nearly every household involved. The segmented cultural and gendered features of this migration and its salience for understanding contemporary transformations in this locale invite a broadening of agrarian studies analysis. The final section expands upon how political ecology can provide such a broader analysis by drawing attention to how extractive resource projects affect local tenure rights and livelihoods, with significant rents captured by the state and resource firms. By making these connections, the author argues there are coercive underpinnings to contemporary Mekong migrations, which may be linked to governance problems in the Lao resource sector. |
URL | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232868597_Land_livelihoods_and_remittances |
Availability | Available for download |
Countries | Laos, Thailand |
Document Type | Journal Article |
Annotations
This article offers a two-fold analysis of what youth out-migration across the Lao-Thai borders means to agrarian transformation in contemporary Laos. It begins by drawing the links between youth migration outflow and migration decisions in interplay with the cultural, social and economic dynamics of sending communities, which implicates ‘new agricultural livelihoods and changes in property rights.’ On the other hand, it provides counter-factual arguments to these conventional arguments by positing youth out-migration to Thailand in a political-ecological context. The research suggests that the presence of extractive development in Laos within the state’s weak institutional mechanism to regulate and coordinate functions as a pushing (or to a certain extent coercive) force for Lao youths to decide to migrate
- Agrarian change and land: Migration and labour - The paper seeks to highlight how migration is perceived in the contexts of cultural ‘embeddedness’, ‘new agricultural livelihoods’ and changes in ‘proper rights’ in sending communities
- FDI and land access: economic land concessions, contract farming, short term and long term renting - Migration as driven by the political ecology of global investment. A critical insight of this paper is its breaking away from conventional understanding of labor migration as a livelihoods strategy to deal with socio-economic distresses, instead looking at the interplay of foreign investment and weak national governance which are at work when people make migration decisions. Political ecology is at work in pushing or, more critically, coercing people to leave their communities to seek employment elsewhere
This paper is a part of a bigger project on agrarian transformation in Laos. It is based on the researcher’s extended fieldwork in the case study village. The methodology used specifically for this sub-project is based on semi-structured interviews (full household coverage), targeted interviews with youth migrants and their parents, as well as participant observation through extensive village stays. The data were supplemented with shorter return visits and interviews. (Provided by Yi Rosa)
- Log in to post comments
- Google Scholar
- BibTex
- XML
- RIS