Search and Download

Export 212 results:
Author Title Type [ Year(Desc)]
Filters: Key Term is CivilSociety-Donors  [Clear All Filters]
2007
Kim AM.  2007.  North versus South: the impact of social norms in the market pricing of private property rights in Vietnam. World Development. 35(12):2079-2095.
2008
Fujita Y, Phengsopha K.  2008.  The Gap Between Policy and Practice in Lao PDR. Lessons from Forest Decentralization: Money, Justice and the Quest for Good Governance in Asia-Pacific. :117-131.
2009
Kerkvliet BJTria.  2009.  Everyday politics in peasant societies (and ours). Journal of Peasant Studies. 36(1):227-243.
Touch S.  2009.  The Impact of Economic Land Concessions on the Local Livelihoods of Forest Communities in Kratie Province, Northeastern Cambodia. (March):i-xv,1-204.
Cambodian_Human_Rights_Action_Committee(CHRAC).  2009.  Losing Ground: Forced Evictions and Intimidation in Cambodia. :1-74.
Palmer D, Fricska S, Wehrmann B, Augustinus C, Munro-faure P, Törhönen M-petteri, Arial A.  2009.  Towards Improved Land Governance. (September):i-iv,1-55.
2010
Woods K.  2010.  Community Forestry in Cease-Fire Zones in Kachin State, Northern Burma: Formalizing Collective Property in Contested Ethnic Areas. CAPRi Workshop on Collective Action, Property Rights, and Conflict in Natural Resources Management. :1-20.
Thiel F.  2010.  Donor-driven land reform in Cambodia – Property rights, planning, and land value taxation. Erdkunde. 64(3):227-239.
Yasmi Y, Broadhead J, Enters T, Genge C.  2010.  Forestry policies, legislation and institutions in Asia and the Pacific: Trends and emerging needs for 2020. :i-vi,1-52.
Sar S.  2010.  Land Reform in Cambodia. Social Aspects of Land Administration and Land Reform. :1-14.
Mellac M, Fortunel F, Tran_Dac_Dan _.  2010.  Land reform in Vietnam: Analysis of the roles played by different actors and changes within central and provincial level institutions. :1-168.
2011
Food_and_Agriculture_Organization_of_the_United_Nations(FAO).  2011.  Cambodia and FAO Achievements and success stories. :1-39.
Land_Watch_Asia(LWA).  2011.  Cambodia: Fighting for Land Rights amid Shrinking Democratic Space. :1-8.
Gillespie J.  2011.  Exploring the Limits of the Judicialization of Urban Land Disputes in Vietnam. Law and Society Review. 45(2):241-276.
Biddulph R.  2011.  Is the Geographies of Evasion hypothesis useful for explaining and predicting the fate of external interventions? The case of REDD in Cambodia Globalization and Development: Rethinking interventions and governance. :1-19.
Lestrelin G, Bourgoin J, Bouahom B, Castella JChristophe.  2011.  Measuring participation: Case studies on village land use planning in northern Lao PDR. Applied Geography. 31(3):950-958.
Bourgoin J, Castella J-C.  2011.  “PLUP FICTION”: Landscape Simulation for Participatory Land Use Planning in Northern Lao PDR. Mountain Research and Development. 31(2):78-88.
Thiel F.  2011.  The Social Economy - Key Element of Sustainable Environmental and Societal Development in Asia. ISERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development. 2(1):31-36.
Daley E.  2011.  Strategies to Get Gender Onto the Agenda of the “Land Grab” Debate. (March):1-5.
Kim AM.  2011.  Talking Back: The Role of Narrative in Vietnam's Recent Land Compensation Changes. Urban Studies. 48(February):493-508.
Labbé D.  2011.  Urban destruction and land disputes in periurban Hanoi during the late-socialist period. Pacific Affairs. 84(3):435-454.
United_States_Agency_for_International_Development(USAID).  2011.  USAID Country Profile: Property Rights and Resource Governance - Cambodia. USAID Country Profile. :1-27.
United_States_Agency_for_International_Development(USAID).  2011.  USAID Country Profile: Property Rights and Resource Governance - Lao PDR. :1-43.
United_States_Agency_for_International_Development(USAID).  2011.  USAID Country Profile: Property Rights and Resource Governance - Thailand. :1-27.
2012
Archer D.  2012.  Baan Mankong participatory slum upgrading in Bangkok, Thailand: Community perceptions of outcomes and security of tenure. Habitat International. 36(1):178-184.

Pages