Search and Download

Export 1032 results:
Author Title [ Type(Desc)] Year
Not Annotated
Tulyasuwan N.  2012.  Land Tenure and PES in Northern Thailand: A case study of Maesa-Kogma Man and Biosphere Reserve. :1-33.
Feder G, Feeny D.  1991.  Land tenure and property rights: theory and implications for development policy. World Bank Development Review. 5(1):135-154.
Neef A, Hager J, Wirth T, Schwarzmeier R, Heidhues F.  2006.  Land tenure and water rights in Thailand and Vietnam - challenges for ethnic minorities in mountainous forest regions. Geografica Helvetica. 61(4):255-265.
Sophal C, Saravy T, Acharya S.  2001.  Land Tenure in Cambodia: A Data Update. (19):i-v,1-66.
Boutry M, Allaverdian C, Mellac M, Huard S, San_Thein U, Tin_Myo_Win _, Pyae_Sone K.  2017.  Land Tenure in Rural Lowland Myanmar: From historical perspectives to contemporary realities in the Dry zone and the Delta. :1-303.
Holden ST, Ghebru H.  2016.  Land tenure reforms, tenure security and food security in poor agrarian economies: Causal linkages and research gaps. Global Food Security. 10:21-28.
McCarthy S.  2016.  Land Tenure Security and Policy Tensions in Myanmar (Burma). Asia Pacific Issues. (127):1-8.
MRLG _.  2019.  Land Tenure Security in '70 Percent Forestland Policy' of the Lao PDR. (Discussion Note Series #6):1-4.
Hutchison J.  2008.  Land titling and poverty reduction in Southeast Asia: realising markets or realising rights? Australian Journal of International Affairs. 62(3):332-344.
Quy-Toan_Do _, Iyer L.  2008.  Land Titling and Rural Transition in Vietnam. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 56(3):531-579.
Bateman M.  2020.  Land Titling Improves Access to Microcredit in Cambodia: Be Careful What You Wish For. 2020 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty. :1-42.
Vandergeest P.  2003.  Land to some tillers: development-induced displacement in Laos. International Social Science Journal. 175:47-56.
Thiri_Shwesin_Aung _, Fischer TB, Buchanan J.  2020.  Land use and land cover changes along the China-Myanmar Oil and Gas pipelines – Monitoring infrastructure development in remote conflict-prone regions. PLoS ONE. 15(8):1-23.
Susumu N.  2019.  Land Use and Land Cover Changes during the Second Indochina War and Their Long-Term Impact on a Hilly Area in Laos. Southeast Asian Studies. 8(2):203-231.
Thon_Anh_Tran _.  2019.  Land use change driven out-migration: Evidence from three flood-prone communities in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Land Use Policy. 88:1-10.
Duangjai W, Schmidt-Vogt D, Shrestha RP.  2015.  Land Use Policy Farmers’ land use decision-making in the context of changing land and conservation policies: A case study of Doi Mae Salong in Chiang Rai Province, Northern Thailand. Land Use Policy. 48:179-189.
Kien_Le _.  2020.  Land use restrictions, misallocation in agriculture, and aggregate productivity in Vietnam. Journal of Development Economics. 145:1-22.
So P, Chun N, Chan S.  2021.  Landscape of land-use finance in Cambodia: full report. :1-84.
Barbesgaard M.  2018.  A landscape of ocean and land-control grabbing in Northern Tanintharyi, Myanmar. :1-15.
Baird IG, Le Billon P.  2012.  Landscapes of Political Memories: War Legacies and Land Negotiations in Laos. Political Geography. 31(5):290-300.
Gillespie J, Hualing F, Pham_Duy_Nghia _.  2014.  Land-Taking Disputes in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis and Implications for Vietnam. :1-60.
Kirk M, Nguyen_Do_Anh_Tuan _.  2009.  Land-Tenure Policy Reforms Decollectivization and the Doi Moi System in Vietnam. (November):i-v,1-35.
Hoang_Huu_Nguyen _, Dargusch P, Moss P, Aziz AAbdul.  2017.  Land-use change and socio-ecological drivers of wetland conversion in Ha Tien Plain, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Land Use Policy. 64:101-113.
Nguyen QH, Tran DD, Dang KK, Korbee D, Pham LDMH, Vu LT, Luu TT, Ho LH, Nguyen PT, Trang TT et al..  2020.  Land-use dynamics in the Mekong delta: From national policy to livelihood sustainability. Sustainable Development. 28(3):448-467.
Chau_Thi_Khank _.  2020.  Land-use rights of foreign-invested enterprises according to Vietnamese law. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. 5(5):185-196.

Pages