Search and Download

Export 1108 results:
Author [ Title(Desc)] Type Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
R
Ironside J.  2017.  The Recognition of Customary Tenure in Vietnam. :i-vi,1-54.
Davidsen S, Anderson JH, Garrido MDelfina Al, Dang_Hung_Vo _, Dang_Ngoc_Dinh _, Tran_Thi_Lan_Huong _.  2011.  Recognizing and Reducing Corruption Risks In Land Management in Vietnam. :1-93.
Promkhambut A, Polthanee A, Simma B, Fox J, Rambo A.T.  2023.  Reconfiguring Farming Systems of Smallholders with Market-Led Approach: A Case Study in Northeast Thailand. Sustainability. 15(16):1-20.
Hua X, Kono Y.  2020.  Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland. Problemy Ekorozwoju. 15(1):179-187.
Quang_Nguyen _, Kim D-C.  2020.  Reconsidering rural land use and livelihood transition under the pressure of urbanization in Vietnam: A case study of Hanoi. Land Use Policy. 99:1-13.
Suhardiman D, DiCarlo J, Keovilignavong O, Rigg J, Nicol A.  2021.  (Re)constructing state power and livelihoods through the Laos-China Railway project. Geoforum. 124:77-88.
Biddulph R.  2012.  REDD and Poverty in Cambodia. :i-iv,1-38.
Dwyer MB, Ingalls M.  2015.  REDD+ at the crossroads: Choices and tradeoffs for 2015 – 2020 in Laos. :i-vi,1-40.
Oberndorf RB.  2010.  REDD+ in the Cambodian Context An Overview of the Policy, Legal and Governance Frameworks Impacting Implementation. :1-59.
Baird IG.  2014.  Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) and Access and Exclusion: Obstacles and Opportunities in Cambodia and Laos. Southeast Asian Studies. 3(3):643-668.
Barney K.  2004.  Re-encountering resistance: Plantation activism and smallholder production in Thailand and Sarawak, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 45(3):325-339.
Pagdee A, Morgan M.  2021.  Reimaging the value of degraded ecosystems: From trash to treasure. Trees, Forests and People. 6:1-8.
Faxon H, Furlong R, Phyu MSabe.  2015.  Reinvigorating resilience: violence against women, land rights, and the women's peace movement in Myanmar. Gender and Development. 23(3):463-479.
Singirankabo UAlban, Ertsen MWillem.  2020.  Relations between Land Tenure Security and Agricultural Productivity: Exploring the Effect of Land Registration. Land. 9(5):1-19.
Fischman EK.  2012.  The Relevance of Tenure and Forest Governance for Incentive Based Mechanisms: Implementing Payments for Ecosystem Services in Doi Mae Salong. :1-22.
Boonjubun C, Haila A, Vuolteenaho J.  2021.  Religious Land as Commons: Buddhist Temples, Monastic Landlordism, and the Urban Poor in Thailand. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 80(2):585-636.
Ayala-cantu L, Morando B.  2020.  Rental markets, gender, and land certificates: Evidence from Vietnam. Food Policy. 94:1-11.
Supreme_National_Economic_Council _.  2007.  The Report of Land and Human Development in Cambodia. :32.
Subedi SP.  2012.  Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia ADDENDUM: A human rights analysis of economic and other land concessions in Cambodia. (A/HRC/21/63/Add.1/Rev.1 (October)):1-130.
Subedi SP.  2010.  Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia: A human rights analysis of economic and other land concessions in Cambodia. 4(July):1-8.
Debonne N, van Vliet J, Heinimann A, Verburg P.  2018.  Representing large-scale land acquisitions in land use change scenarios for the Lao PDR. Regional Environmental Change. 18:1857-1869.
Golay C.  2019.  Research Brief: The Implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas. :1-10.
Miller F, Dun O.  2019.  Resettlement and the environment in Vietnam: Implications for climate change adaptation planning. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 60(2):132-147.
Watson I.  2019.  The Resilience Agenda in Neoliberalising Cambodia. New Political Economy. 24(4):441-456.
Hall R, Edelman M, Borras_Jr. SM, Scoones I, White B, Wolford W.  2015.  Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’ The Journal of Peasant Studies. 42(3-4):467-488.

Pages