Search and Download

Export 226 results:
Author [ Title(Desc)] Type Year
Filters: Key Term is AgriculturalModernization  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
P
Sakayarote K, Shrestha RP.  2016.  Policy-driven rubber plantation and its driving factors: a case of smallholders in northeast Thailand. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. :1-12.
Woods K.  2012.  The Political Ecology of Rubber Production in Myanmar: An Overview. :1-34.
Scurrah N, Hirsch P.  2015.  The political economy of land governance in Cambodia. :32. (504.4 KB)
Hirsch P, Scurrah N.  2015.  The political economy of land governance in Lao PDR. (November):23. (497.76 KB)
Scurrah N, Hirsch P, Woods K.  2015.  The political economy of land governance in Myanmar. :32. (568.45 KB)
Hirsch P, Scurrah N.  2015.  The political economy of land governance in the Mekong Region. :52. (703.1 KB)
Hirsch P, Mellac M, Scurrah N.  2016.  The political economy of land governance in Viet Nam. :24. (4.72 MB)
Nguyễn_Văn_Sửu _.  2004.  The Politics of Land: Inequality in Land Access and Local Conflicts in the Red River Delta Since Decollectivization. Social Inequality in Vietnam and the Challenges to Reform. :270-296.
Barney K.  2007.  Power, Progress and Impoverishment: Plantations, Hydropower, Ecological Change and Community Transformation in Hinboun District, Lao PDR. :1-139.
To P.  2023.  Powers of exclusion: A case study of state-led large scale rubber development in Vietnam's north-western region. Journal of Land Use Science. 18(1):249-262.
Baird IG.  2020.  Problems for the plantations: Challenges for large-scale land concessions in Laos and Cambodia. Journal of Agrarian Change. 20(3):387-407.
Nanhthavong V, Bieri S, Nguyen AThu, Hett C, Epprecht M.  2022.  Proletarianization and gateways to precarization in the context of land-based investments for agricultural commercialization in Lao PDR. World Development. 155:105885.
Wells-Dang A.  2013.  Promoting Land Rights in Vietnam: A Multi-sector Advocacy Coalition Approach. Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty. :1-25.
Kemper N, Luu_Viet_Ha _, Klump R.  2015.  Property Rights and Consumption Volatility: Evidence from a Land Reform in Vietnam. World Development. 71:107-130.
Newman C, Tarp F, van den Broeck K.  2015.  Property Rights and Productivity: The Case of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam. Land Economics. 91(1):91-105.
R
Liu R.  2012.  Rapid Appraisal of Cross-Border Agricultural Business along NSEC: Focus on China-Laos Border. :1-55.
Belton B, Myat_Thida_Win _, Zhang X, Filipski M.  2021.  The rapid rise of agricultural mechanization in Myanmar. Food Policy. 101:1-14.
Salaisook P, Faysse N, Tsusaka TW.  2020.  Reasons for adoption of sustainable land management practices in a changing context: A mixed approach in Thailand. Land Use Policy. 96:1-9.
Barney K.  2004.  Re-encountering resistance: Plantation activism and smallholder production in Thailand and Sarawak, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 45(3):325-339.
Singirankabo UAlban, Ertsen MWillem.  2020.  Relations between Land Tenure Security and Agricultural Productivity: Exploring the Effect of Land Registration. Land. 9(5):1-19.
Debonne N, van Vliet J, Heinimann A, Verburg P.  2018.  Representing large-scale land acquisitions in land use change scenarios for the Lao PDR. Regional Environmental Change. 18:1857-1869.
Liversage H..  2011.  Responding to ‘land grabbing’ and promoting responsible investment in agriculture. IFAD Occasional Paper 2. :1-16.
Promkhambut A, Yokying P, Woods K, Fisher M, Yong MLi, Manorom K, Baird IG, Fox J.  2023.  Rethinking agrarian transition in Southeast Asia through rice farming in Thailand. World Development. 169(June):106309.
Vicol M, Pritchard B, Yu_Yu_Htay _.  2018.  Rethinking the role of agriculture as a driver of social and economic transformation in Southeast Asia's upland regions: The view from Chin State, Myanmar. Land Use Policy. 72:451-460.
Suhardiman D, Giordano M, Keovilignavong O, Sotoukee T.  2015.  Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss. Land Use Policy. 49:195-202.

Pages